Unwarranted Cellular Tracking in The United States Essay -- Personal F

In this day and come along of technology and digital information, finding the location of a restaurant or landmark only takes the click of a button. At the identical time, the technology macrocosm used for directions and GPS allows the government to find the location of allone at any given moment, watching over all as they so please. The preponderance of unwarranted cell phone tracking is extremely high, so much(prenominal) so that a case was taken to the Supreme Court to controversy the issue. It was decided in this case, United States v. Jones, that a device having its movements tracked is the same as trespassing on property (United States Supreme Court). More late than this, the American Civil Liberties Union released several public records detailing the border police departments use before tracing cell phone locations. Shockingly, it was revealed that a large majority of departments around the country fail to acquire a proper warrant before tracking suspects (Crump). Considering the ubiquity of cell phones in society today, jokes about the government turning into a Big sidekick watching over citizens have nearly become a universe in the U.S., with tremendous worries about what little privacy there is left. What was at once thought of as a handy communication tool has this instant turned into a traveling tracker for the police to spy on the familiar man with. Imagine, every step outside of a denizens home being tracked step for step. This was entirely unknown before, and the revelation of such broke the illusion of safety civilians thought they had. Law enforcement agencies shouldnt be allowed to so freely track cell phones without the use of a warrant, it violates a citizens rights, gives no examine to privacy, and creates an inconsistent legal standard within ag... ...media story brings this issue to flicker again. Making the push to put reform on this matter and enacting a law to require warrants will restore the values law enforc ement agencies atomic number 18 meant to uphold, and bring back the sense of security that is seldom found in society today.Works CitedClark, M. Wesley. Cell earpieces as Tracking Devices, 41 Val. U. L. Rev. 1413 (2007).Crump, C.. Results of comprehensive government cell phone tracking records request show customary violations of Americans privacy rights. . N.p., 2012. Web. 22 whitethorn 2012. Lightblau, Eric. Police Are Using Phone Tracking as a Routine Tool. www.nytimes.com. New York Times, 03/3. Web. 28 May 2012. U.S. Supreme Court, . United States v. Jones Opinion.supremecourt.gov. Us Government, 2012. Web. 28 May 2012. Cell Tracking. electronic frontier foundation. EFF, n.d. Web. 22 May 2012.