Death Penalty Essay

1.ABSTRACTThis essay was primary(prenominal)ly abtaboo remainder penalisation. The teaching of essay was parti ally taken from the internet, through discussion among tutor and friends as well as general knowledge from breakside sources. The impersonal of carrying out wipeout penalisation is to show that justice for perfect offensive shut away exists. Electrocution, hanging, gas chamber, firing squad and deadly injection atomic number 18 the methods of doing in cobblers last penalization. In contrast, devastation penalization is a necessity evil that serves as disapproverent to overturn nuisance rate, assures safety of the golf club and extreme criminals merit retribution for their action. In conclusion, demise penalization comes with validatory and negative effects throughout a lot of aspects. Whether cobblers last penalization is in hu earthity or a necessary evil, it is an argu adapted issue in the society.2.INTRODUCTION dying penalization is the around contentious penal practice in the modern world and it has always been a controversial issue until today. remnant penalty can be defined as a do work to kill an individual by the state (Amnesty International 2010). Death penalty as a just penalization should be distinguished rationally to fit the curse. For instance, a person who stole magazine from a bookstall does non deserve finis penalty as their punishment. However, a sequential killer, who commits homicide repetitively for no tolerable basiss, definitely deserves expiry penalty. As yen as criminals such as in series(p) killers still exist, we go away cut down our smell living in fear. In Malaysia, the expiry penalty is needful for nigh offenses such as discharging a firearm with the intention of make shoemakers last and offences against the person of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong and murder (Laws of Malaysia 2006). This issue, stopping point penalty is very distinguished because it is related to ones l ives. Is the closing penalty in clemente or a necessary evil? Some strongly believe that end penalty is against human veraciouss and terminal penalty be more than vitality without parole. However, expiration penalty serves as a confirmation to facilitate reduce crime rate, assures safety of the society and extreme criminals deserve retribution for their action.3.BACKGROUND fairy Hammurabi of Babylon was the first to establish the death penalty codes for 25 different crimes fundament in the Eighteenth blow B.C. The death penalty was listed in the fourteenth Century B.C.s Hittite Code in the S counterbalanceth Century B.C.s Draconian Code of Athens, which made death the only punishment for all crimes and in the Fifth Century B.C.s Roman fairness of the Twelve Tablets. Crucifixion, drowning, burning alive and impalement are among the ways to perform death penalty (Death Penalty Information Center 2010).The historical background of death penalty is compelling because ones m oral had never been accent until today. Nowadays, some countries still carry out death penalty and the objective is to remind and to show their people the consequences of committing extreme crime. In the last decade, a lot of unpolished has abolished the death penalty but more than cubic decimeter countries still retain the death penalty practice and law. For example, Malaysia, Indonesia, Singapore, join States and India are among the countries that still practice death penalty until today (Prosecuting Attorney 2010). refer term 1. Crucifixion hanging on a cross, a method of capital punishment in ancient times. 2. Impalement to pierce with a strident stake or point. 3. Retribution punishment that is turn overed to be morally right and fully deserved. 4. Shia a Muslim who adheres to branch of Islam.4. foreclose ARGUMENTS4.1 FIRST COUNTER ARGUMENT Death penalty is against human rights. If we believe human heart is sacred, then the states executioner should be barred from c arrying out the death penalty. We should respect and try to embrace human dignity. In 1997, the U.N. last Commission for Human rights agreed upon a decision stating that an outlaw of the death penalty contributes to the improvement of human dignity and to the progress of human rights (C. Richard 2011). Countries that ensure the death penalty is a human right issue abolished death penalty. For example, the member states of the Council of Europe have added Protocol 6 to the European convention on Human Rights calling for the outlaw of the death penalty (Protocol to the American Convention on Human Rights 1979). The death penalty certainly goes against our most basic human right which is the right to have a life this is also applied even to those who commit murder. For example, an execution by lethal injection or electrocution will take the lives of convicted felons and that clearly violates the human rights.4. 2 certify COUNTER ARGUMENTOn top of that, death penalty cost more than life without parole, which is also known as life durance. We should be aware that death penalty is time consume and expensive. In 1995, the Bomber of Oklahoma City named Timothy McVeighs had been penalise and his execution costs more than $13 million. Furthermore, since the death penalty was restored in New York in 1995, it costs approximately $23 million for each person condemned to death (BBC Ethics Guide 2011). Suppose a cheaper weft is available when we compare the prices of a similar television, we will definitely cloud the cheaper one. This is how we should apply when discussing death penalty and life imprisonment. The capital cases in the United States can cost up to millions of dollars from arresting to executing a criminal with death penalty but cases finishing with life imprisonment costs only around $500,000 (Jones Elliot 2009). All of this money could have been used to repossess poverty around the globe. Therefore, we should save hundreds of lives around the world instead of ending ones life with that amount of money.5. TRANSITIONThe arguments claimed by the opponents state that death penalty violates human rights and a lot of money will be wasted on death penalty is actually essential but the death penalty is not killing the criminals, it is a punishment for their extreme action and justice can never be c onceit in financial terms. Death penalty affects more factors positively than causing negative effect. Death penalty serves as a deterrent to help reduce crime rate, assures safety of the society by eliminating criminals and some criminals deserve retribution for their action are the main factors that should be addressed seriously.death penalty essaycrime rates in states with death penalty vs. withoutessay on death penaltyessays on death penaltythe death penalty essay6. ARGUMENTS6.1. FIRST ARGUMENT Death penalty is a necessary evil that serves as deterrent to reduce crime rate. Everybody fears death, even animals. If extreme criminals a re executed by death penalty, all the potential criminals will definitely think twice before committing extreme crime because their own life is at stake. Majority of studies claimed that the existence of death penalty increases the crime rate but some of the studies did not consider early(a) factors that affects crime rate. For example, the major factors that constantly contributing to an increase of crime rate are residential population, individual family issue, climate and economic hold back (Annual Crime Report 1998). Moreover, all the matters regarding deterrence has been studied by a Professor of Jurisprudence named Ernest van den Haag from Fordham University. He stated that even though statistical demonstrations are not conclusive, capital punishment deter more than other punishments because people fear death more than anything else (Arguments for and Against the Death penalty 2000).Death penalty is 100% effective as deterrent to the criminal universe executed that killer w ould not be able to commit anymore crimes especially homicide (Stephen K 1985). Suppose life imprisonment is the maximum penalty in a state, nothing can balk those prisoners who are facing life imprisonment to commit more crime especially murder again in prison. Assault in prisons in all over US, both against fellow inmates and against staff, have more than manifold in the past decades, according to statistics gathered by Criminal judge Institute in Middletown, Connecticut(Van Paul 1998). Death penalty is a necessary evil that should be retained because criminal especially serial killers will learn a lesson which is death penalty is the most competent punishment of justice for their extreme crime.death penalty research writingagainst death penalty essaythesis statement about death penaltydeath penalty essaysdeath penalty paper6.2. SECOND ARGUMENT Furthermore, safety of the society will not be the main concern once those criminals are executed by death penalty. However, criminal s especially murderers can plead for insanity or mental retardation. The courts have sure a general definition of mental retardation as being significantly sub average in general intellectual cognitive operation existing concurrently with deficits in adaptive behaviour and manifested during the developmental halt (Garner Corinne 1990). For example, a drug related brain-damaged killer barely knew his own identity element when he raped and murdered a woman and her daughter in front of a 3 year old boy. The insane man then pled for insanity which made him spent his 22 years in jail.We would not know the truth behind the crime scene he might consume the drugs right after killing because anyone would take put on the line just to continue living. Next, if he were mentally modifyd from the beginning he brings danger towards the society. The procedures of identifying mental retardation vary from state to state and some of the procedures used to identify mental retardation have come to be questioned. Some of the prisoners identified as having mental retardation have mislabelled (Petersilia 1997). This is why death penalty is crucial for those who damage themselves mentally or those who are born with mental problems if they connected extreme crime more than once because it is for the safety of the society. Thus, death penalty is not inhumane because it benefits the mentally disable criminal to prevent them from committing sins without them realizing it.6.3. THIRD ARGUMENT Last but not least, some criminals deserve retribution for their action. Death penalty is not vindicate but simply returning the nature of the extreme crime committed as a punishment. Criminals such as murderers are the ones that keep demonstrating inhumanity. Anti-death penalty supporters believe that death penalty is inhumane and barbarous. Well, so is murder. If murderers do not value the life of their victim then there is no reason their life should be valuable.In addition, murderers negle cted their rights as a human when they violate the rights of their victim (Jones Elliot 2009). The rights of the victims are more important than the rights of the criminal. Death penalty will bring closure to the criminal and closure to the ordeal for the victims family. The greatest example in history would be ibn Talal Hussein Hussein He is punished by death penalty because he committed extreme crime against humanity when he murdered 148 Shias in Tigris river city of Dujail in 1982. The society was finally satisfied when he was sentenced to death because it brings closure to the ordeal for the 148 victims family (BBC News 2006). Thus, criminals such as Saddam deserve death penalty retribution as a proportionate punishment.7.CONCLUSIONIn this essay, I have listed two effects of death penalty death penalty is against human rights and death penalty costs more than life without parole. I have also discussed three reasons why death penalty is a necessary evil death penalty serves as a deterrent to help reduce crime rate, assures safety of the society and extreme criminals deserve retribution for their action. The reality is that our country, Malaysia still practices death penalty today because the government knows whats best for their people. Government of other country should think carefully and take into considerations all the angle of relegate of death penalty. Everything has their effects. Therefore, the governments should come up with wise solutions for the entire question that rises regarding death penalty. A rational solution can make a country unite and more stable in various aspects.opponents of the death penalty argue all but which one of the following?juvenile death penalty pros and consdeath penalty essay introductionessay against death penaltydeath penalty introductionessays on the death penalty